Sediment is made up of loose particles of sand, silt and clay. It is a natural part of the Chesapeake Bay, created by the weathering of rocks and soil. In excess amounts, sediment can cloud the waters of the Bay and its tributaries, harming underwater grasses, fish and shellfish.
Sediment forms when rocks and soil weather and erode. Around 5.2 million tons of sediment enter the Chesapeake Bay in an average year.
There are two major sources of sediment: eroding land and stream banks—called watershed sources of sediment—and eroding shorelines and coasts—called tidal sources of sediment.
Eroding land and stream banks are called watershed sources of sediment. Watershed erosion increases when land is cleared of vegetation to make way for agriculture and development. Scientists estimate that most of the sediment that flows into the Chesapeake Bay comes from watershed sources.
In the Bay watershed, river basins with the highest percentage of agricultural lands yield the highest amount of sediment each year. Basins with the highest percentage of forest cover, on the other hand, yield the lowest amount of sediment. On a per-acre basis, construction sites can produce the most sediment of all land uses—as much as 10 to 20 times that of agricultural lands.
Since the seventeenth century, watershed-wide changes in land use and land cover have disrupted the natural processes of erosion:
Eroding shorelines and nearshore areas, as well as the resuspension of already-eroded sediments, are known as tidal sources of sediment. Tidal erosion increases when shoreline vegetation is removed and there are not enough bay grasses growing in the offshore shallows to lessen the force of waves against the shoreline.
The Bay’s shorelines have been slowly eroding for thousands of years, due to wave action and natural sea-level rise. Tidal erosion can help maintain the Bay’s complex ecosystem; beaches and tidal wetlands, which are created and replenished by erosion, provide habitat for countless critters, including blue crabs, herons and terrapins.
However, human development along the shoreline can have negative impacts on the natural processes of tidal erosion:
Accelerated sea-level rise caused by climate change can also increase tidal erosion.
Excess sediment is a leading factor in the Chesapeake Bay’s poor health.
Because of their small size, the particles of sand, silt and clay that we call “sediment” often float through the water rather than settling to the bottom, and can be carried long distances during rainstorms. When there are too many sediment particles suspended in the water, the water becomes cloudy and muddy-looking. Cloudy water does not allow sunlight to reach the plants that grow on the bottom of the Bay’s shallows. Without sunlight, these plants—including underwater grasses—die, which affects the young fish and shellfish that depend on them for shelter.
Excess sediment can also have harmful effects on the wider Bay and the people who use it:
Each year, the Susquehanna River provides the Chesapeake Bay with one-quarter of its sediment loads. For decades, three large reservoirs that sit behind dams located along the lower portion of the river have held back some of the sediment pollution that would have otherwise entered the Bay. But recent studies have drawn attention to these reservoirs’ changing effectiveness as “pollution gates,” with special attention paid to the reservoir behind the Conowingo Hydroelectric Generating Station, or Conowingo Dam.
In 2012, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) reported that the reservoir behind the Conowingo Dam had lost its ability to trap sediment and attached nutrients over the long term.
In 2014, the Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment (LSRWA) team released the results of its evaluation of sediment management options at the Conowingo Dam. It found:
While the effects of the sediment that can scour from behind the dam essentially cease once it settles to the bottom of waterways, lowering both sediment and nutrient pollution upstream of the Conowingo Dam would benefit Bay health.
To learn more, visit Learn the Issues: Conowingo Dam.
For Chesapeake Bay restoration to be a success, we all must do our part. Our everyday actions can have a big impact on the Bay. By making simple changes in our lives, each one of us can take part in restoring the Bay and its rivers for future generations to enjoy.
To lower sediment pollution, consider combating erosion on your property. Spread mulch over bare ground, or plant buffers of trees and shrubs to capture runoff and hold soil in place.
Sam Owings combined his experience as a farmer and developer to address agriculture runoff
Data show significant drop in nutrient and sediment loads
Computer simulations track partner progress toward clean water goals
New data has given the Chesapeake Bay Program a more accurate picture of pollution in the watershed.
Lowering nutrient and sediment loads could have a positive impact on the Chesapeake Bay.
During the 2015 water year (October 2014 to September 2015), approximately 1.5 million tons—or 2.9 billion pounds—of sediment reached the Chesapeake Bay. This is below the long-term average of 5 million tons—or 10 billion pounds—per year. River flow averaged 41 billion gallons per day during this time, which is below the long-term average of 51 billion gallons per day.
Four of the monitoring sites in the Chesapeake Bay watershed show improving long-term flow-adjusted trends in suspended sediment concentrations. Between 1985 and 2014:
For more information, visit the U.S. Geological Survey’s Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations: Water Year 2014 Update.
Over the past decade, three of the monitoring sites in the Chesapeake Bay watershed have shown improving flow-adjusted trends in sediment concentrations. Between 2005 and 2014:
For more information, visit the U.S. Geological Survey’s Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations: Water Year 2014 Update.
Scientist Allen Gellis with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) visits Linganore Creek in Maryland to describe how he conducts studies of sediment sources in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Sediment forms when rocks and soil weather and erode. There are two major sources of sediment: eroding land and stream banks—called watershed sources of sediment—and eroding shorelines and coasts—called tidal sources of sediment. An estimated 2.7 million tons of sediment was delivered to the Chesapeake Bay in 2013 and an average of 5.2 million tons comes in each year. Too much sediment can cloud the waters of the Bay and its tributaries, harming underwater grasses, fish and shellfish.
Publication date: January 15, 2013 | Type of document: Backgrounder | Download: Electronic Version
Each year, the Susquehanna River provides the Bay with one-quarter of its sediment loads. Working to curb these loads are three large reservoirs located along the lower portion of the river, each of which sits behind a dam. These…
Publication date: August 05, 2010 | Type of document: | Download: Electronic Version
2010 Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants map (PDF)
Publication date: August 05, 2010 | Type of document: | Download: Electronic Version
2010 Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants Awardees and Projects backgrounder
Publication date: June 01, 2009 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Water quality in Chesapeake Bay has degraded over the past 50 years with respect to oxygen depletion and reduced light attenuation. While the causes are numerous, sediment resuspension from wave and tidal action cloud the water column and…
Publication date: May 23, 2007 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
This workshop was held to cover the topic of Sedimentsheds. sedimentshed is a new concept, and is defined as the area that contributes the sediment which directly influences water clarity in near-shore Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAV)…
Publication date: October 01, 2006 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
The Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP) hosted a workshop in Annapolis, Maryland on February 24-25, 2003, at which sediment experts shared information related to sediment best management practices (BMPs). The information presented on selected BMPs…
Publication date: May 23, 2006 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
The attenuation of light underwater is an important process in estuaries, directly affecting phytoplankton, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), visually orienting predators, and indirectly affecting oxygen depletion and other water quality…
Publication date: May 01, 2005 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Sediment is the third biggest pollutant to the Bay and its tributaries. Tidal sediment comprises approximately 57% of the sediment load to the Bay. Excess sediment is a key contributor to degraded water clarity and damages critical habitats…
Publication date: January 10, 2005 | Type of document: Directive | Download: Electronic Version
This Directive addresses next steps, each of which will advance Tributary Strategy implementation, and identifies measures to implement several Panel recommendations upon which action can be taken quickly.
Publication date: December 09, 2003 | Type of document: Directive | Download: Electronic Version
improving water quality is the most critical element in the overall protection and restoration of the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries was the goal of this directive.
Publication date: December 01, 2003 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
The Chesapeake 2000 agreement has been guiding Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and the District of Columbia, the Chesapeake Bay Commission and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their combined efforts to restore and protect…
Publication date: June 01, 2003 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
In developing revised water quality standards for the Chesapeake Bay and its Tidal tributaries, states may conduct use attainability analyses. This document provides economic analyses performed by the CBP related controls to meet revised…
Publication date: April 25, 2003 | Type of document: Policy Memorandum | Download: Electronic Version
Policy memo concerning decisions regarding nutrient and sediment load allocations and ne submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) goals.
Publication date: April 10, 2002 | Type of document: Report
One of the Tidal monitoring and Analysis Workgroup's primary responsibilities is assessing and reporting the status and trends of nutrients and other parameters monitored within the scope of the Chesapeake Bay Program water quality and…
Publication date: August 15, 1998 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Chesapeake Bay watershed model precipitation and meteorological data development and atmospheric nutrient deposition.
Publication date: August 15, 1998 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Appendix F documents in detail the Phase IV Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model point source nutrient data assimilation process for the facilities located in signatory and non-signatory jurisdictions of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. This…
Publication date: August 01, 1998 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
This is a report on the Chesapeake bay Watershed Model
Publication date: May 15, 1998 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Appendix B documents the water quality calibration of the Phase IV Watershed Model. Simulated and observed concentrations are compared for 8 years of calibration (1984-1991) at 15 water quality stations. Calibration data is shown for…
Publication date: May 15, 1998 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Comparison of simulated and observed flow for 8 years of calibration (1984-1991).
Publication date: March 01, 1998 | Type of document: Report | Download: Electronic Version
Changes in Sediment and Nutrient Storage in Three Reservoirs in the Lower Susquehanna River Basin and Implications for the Chesapeake Bay.