Records 1-20 of 74
Directive 93-4: Fish Passage Goals
(13 KB)
Publication date: 12/27/1993 | Type of document: Directive
Overview of the Fish Passage Strategy provisions that will enable anadromous fish to have access to a multitude of passages in the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries, thus providing abundant spawning habitat.
Restoring Fish Passages Throughout the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
(165 KB)
Publication date: 2/24/2004 | Type of document: Fact Sheet
Mill dams, hydroelectric dams and small blockages constructed over the
past two centuries prevent fish throughout the Bay watershed from
reaching their natal rivers.
Many migratory fish populations consequently have suffered severe
declines. With the removal of Embrey Dam, Chesapeake Bay Program
partners have undertaken 123 fish passage projects, reopening more than
1,300 river miles to migratory fish in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
These removals allow critical species such as American shad and river
herring to reclaim their native waters.
Removing Impediments to Migratory Fishes in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed - Annual Progress Report
Publication date: 7/1/1999 | Type of document: Report
In 1997 and 1998 the CBP signatories opened 294.3 miles of blocked tributary habitat to migratory fish and 67 miles to resident fish (a total of 361.3 miles) within the Bay watershed. Since the program's inception, almost 80 projects have been completed, which opened 523.5 stream miles to migratory fish. This report discusses fish passage project currently in the planning, design or construction phases for 1999 and future years.
Adoption Statement - Fish Passage Goals
(187 KB)
Publication date: 1/10/2005 | Type of document: Adoption Statement
In support of our continuing pursuit of our shard vision of a Chesapeake Bay system with abundant, diverse populations of living resources, we reaffirm our commitment to protect and restore riverine aquatic habitats of the Chesapeake Bay watershed for the benefit of migratory and resident fishes and other aquatic living resources.
Removing Impediments to Migratory Fishes in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Publication date: 10/1/1997 | Type of document: Report
Annual progress report: Description of all fish passage development, reintroduction efforts, and habitat assessment activities by signatory jurisdictions. Summary of federal agency activities in 1996, as well as actions planned for 1997.
Shad in the Chesapeake Bay
(265 KB)
Publication date: 2/20/2004 | Type of document: Fact Sheet
American shad constituted one of the most important mid-Atlantic
fishery until the early 20th century, but by the mid-19th century,
their populations had begun to decline. Over-harvesting, pollution and
habitat degradation led to a sharp downturn in shad numbers. The
construction of small mill dams and other obstructions, and later the
development of large hydroelectric dams, blocked migratory fish from
their spawning habitat. Bay Program partners have undertaken 123 fish
passage projects, reopening more than 1,300 river miles to migratory
fish in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. When combined with stocking
efforts, fish passages and dam removals have led to significant
increases in ...
Fish Passage Goals
Publication date: 1/1/1993 | Type of document: Fact Sheet
Chesapeake Bay Executive Council Directive: Council endorses a 1,356.75 mile
major tributary target for blockage removal in ten years, restoring critical
mainstem habitat
What You Should Know About Fish Lesions
Publication date: 11/18/1999 | Type of document: Brochure
This work contains the following themes as they relate to the Chesapeake Bay:
The Living Natural Bay/Ecosystems. This 6 panel brochure explains Pfiesteria
piscida and how to detect its symptoms in fish or shellfish, and what to do if
fish with lesions are identified. State hotline telephone numbers are included.
Memorandum of Agreement on Little Falls Dam Fish Passage
(105 KB)
Publication date: 1/1/1996 | Type of document: MOU/MOA
This MOA establishes a general framework for cooperation and participation among the MD DNR, the VA Dept of Game and Inland fisheries, District of Columbia, ICPRB, the Potomac River Fisheries Commission, the U.S., Army corps of Engineers, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the national Biological Service, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the National Park Service, the NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service, and Montgomery county, MD in reestablishing migratory and anadromous fish access and restoring a migratory fish population in an historic spawning spawning habitat upstream of Little Falls Dam on the Potomac River in Montgomery County, MD. collectively, the parties to the ...
Chesapeake Bay Living Resources 1997, Living Resources Subcommittee Annual Report
Publication date: 8/1/1998 | Type of document: Report
This report details the Chesapeake Bay Program's Living Resources Subcommittee accomplishments for 1997. Accomplishments in wetlands, bay grasses, oyster reef restoration, fisheries management, fish passage, habitat restoration, exotic species, waterfowl and other water birds, biological monitoring, and ecosystem modeling are presented.
Directive 94-1: Riparian Forest Buffers
(16 KB)
Publication date: 10/14/1994 | Type of document: Directive
The restoration of water quality and living resources are the principal goals of
the 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Subsequent updates of this Agreement,
including one in 1993, committed the Program to develop tributary-specific
nutrient reduction strategies, and to construct migratory fish passages and
remove stream blockages in the tributaries to restore hundreds of miles of
historic spawning areas
Memorandum of Understanding Between the U.S. Fish and wildlife Service and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Publication date: 1/1/1988 | Type of document: MOU/MOA
This MOU provides for enhanced cooperation between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Chesapeake Bay Program. This agreement is established for the purpose of facilitating exchange of information between agencies and to heighten the awareness of the other's activities so that optimum Federal and state cooperation is achieved in each agency's efforts to assist with the implementation of the Chesapeake 1987 agreement.