BMP Verification Committee
The BMP Verification Committee is responsible for developing all of the elements of a basinwide BMP verification framework, including principles, protocols, review panels and other related procedures.
Meetings
No upcoming meetings.
Communications Workgroup September 2021 Meeting
BMP Verification Committee Conference Call
BMP Verification Committee Conference Call, March 3, 2015
About
The Best Management Practices (BMP) Verification Committee is charged with responsibility for developing all the elements of a basinwide BMP verification framework— BMP verification principles, protocols, review panel, and other verification related procedures (e.g., eliminating double counting, clean up of historical databases)—working in tandem with the Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership's pollutant source sector and habitat restoration workgroups.
The BMP Verification Framework includes:
- Verification principles – Partnership agreement on principles to guide the jurisdictions’ development and implementation of BMP verification programs
- Source sector- and habit-specific verification protocols – Developed through the Water Quality Goal Implementation Team's source sector workgroups — Agriculture, Forestry, Stormwater, and Wastewater — and Vital Habitat GIT’s habitat workgroups — Wetlands and Streams — and approved by the Partnership
- Verification review panel – Regional and national verification experts charged by the Partnership to review/make recommendations on the seven jurisdictions’ proposed verification programs
Goals and Priorities
Priority work tasks include the following:
- Review, comment on, and modify a working draft approach to preventing double counting BMPs developed by USGS working with the six states and NRCS.
- Review, comment on, and modify a working draft approach to cleaning up historical BMP databases developed by EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office staff.
- Synthesize the various source sector workgroups and accounting workgroups/teams recommended verification protocols, feedback on the principles, etc. into an initial BMP verification framework for presentation to the WQGIT and then the other GITs for feedback and direction.
- Take the individual and collective feedback from the six GITs and the three advisory committees and revise the BMP verification framework prior to presentation to the Management Board.
- Take the feedback from the Management Board and work with the appropriate workgroups and GITs to address the concerns and specific direction from the Management Board.
- Let the Management Board know when all the components of the partnership’s overall BMP verification framework are ready for presentation to the Principals’ Staff Committee for review and adoption.
BMP Verification Program Plan Documentation
Please visit the following webpage for access to the jurisdictions' draft BMP Verification Program Plans, initial feedback reports on the draft Verification Program Plans submitted on June 30, 2015, as well as other useful resources related to the BMP Verification effort.
www.chesapeakebay.net/about/programs/bmp/additional_resources
Projects
Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Document
Revised final draft of the Chespeake Bay Basinwide BMP Verification Framwork document, updated in August 2014 for review by the Management Board. Supporting documentation provided as Appendices A-U.
Integrating Federal and State data records to report progress
Integrating Federal and State data records to report progress in establishing agricultural conservation practices on Chesapeake Bay farms. The final published report and appendices are available online via USGS: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2013/1287/
Citation:
Hively, W.D., Devereux, O.H., and Claggett, Peter, 2013, Integrating Federal and State data records to report progress in establishing agricultural conservation practices on Chesapeake Bay farms: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2013–1287, 36 p., http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20131287.
Existing State and USGS 1619 Data Sharing Agreements
Maryland, New York, Virginia and West Virginia as well as the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) currently have signed 1619 data sharing agreements with U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) and Farm Services Agency (FSA). As part of the collaborative work on larger BMP Verification Framework, the jurisdictional partners are working closely with NRCS and FSA to ensure all six states have consistent, comprehensive data sharing agreements in place. The objective is to ensure each jurisdiction has equal and full access to all federally cost shared data needed to fully credit producers for their implementation conservation practices. These agreements ensure that full access to data while maintaining the business confidentiality of the individual producers information and data. The USGS’s 1619 data sharing agreements with NRCS and FSA were put into place to assist the six states in: getting full access to the federal cost shared data; enhancing their existing tracking and reporting systems; and developing and fully implementing procedures to eliminate any double counting of individual practices funded by two (or more) state/federal cost share programs.
Documentation and Tables for CBP-Approved BMPs
To view the most recent version of the Scenario Builder documentation, go here: http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/documentation_for_scenario_builder
Jurisdictions' BMP Tracking and Reporting Leads and Contacts
Publications
Water Quality Goal Implementation Team (GIT) Governance Protocols
Publication date: Not listedThe decision-making procedures and cross-sector communication processes observed by the Water Quality GIT and its workgroups.
View document [PDF, 176.4 KB] Water Quality Goal Implementation Team (GIT) Governance Protocols
BMP Verification Principles
Publication date:Developed by the BMP Verification Committee and Water Quality Goal Implementation Team, these principles were adopted by the Principals' Staff Committee to guide the jurisdictions’ development and implementation of BMP verification programs.
Related Resources
-
Links to the jurisdictions' Phase I and Phase II Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs)
The Chesapeake Bay Program's Watershed Implementation Plans webpage has direct links to each of the Phase I and Phase II Plans.
-
CAST Documentation
The Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST) is an online nutrient and sediment load estimator tool. The documentation provides definitions and information about Best Management Practices (BMPs).
-
Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Tools
The Chesapeake Bay Program's WIP Tools page provides links to modeling documentation and information about BMPs. Disclaimer: some links may be outdated. See CAST/VAST/MAST for updated documentation.
-
Delaware DNREC's Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan webpage
View or download the Phase II WIP here
-
District of Columbia's Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan
Washington DC's Phase II WIP from DDOE's website
-
Maryland's Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan
View or download Maryland's Phase II WIP and related documents from MDE's website
-
New York DEC's Chesapeake Bay Program webpage
Find New York's Phase I Watershed Implementation Plan and similar documents here (scroll down the page)
-
Pennsylvania DEP's Chesapeake Bay Program webpage
Find Pennsylvania's Watershed Implementation Plans (WIPs) and all other TMDL- and Bay-related documents here (scroll down)
-
Virginia's Chesapeake Bay TMDL webpage
Virginia's Watershed Implementation Plans and other supporting documents are available here.
-
West Virginia's Chesapeake Bay Program documents
West Virginia's final Bay-related documents are available here
Our Workgroups & Action Teams
Our Members
- Whitney Ashead (Staffer)
Chesapeake Research Consortium asheadw@chesapeake.org - Ann Swanson
Chesapeake Bay Commission aswanson@chesbay.us - Aaron Ristow
Upper Susquehanna Coalition aaronristow@tcswcd.org - Beth McGee
Chesapeake Bay Foundation bmcgee@cbf.org - Bill Angstadt
Delaware Maryland Agribusiness Association angstadtconsult@aol.com - George Onyullo
District of Columbia Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE) george.onyullo@dc.gov - John Rhoderick
Maryland Department of Agriculture JohnCRhoderick@gmail.com - Matt Monroe
West Virginia Department of Agriculture-Regulatory and Environmental Affairs Division mmonroe@wvda.us - Patricia Buckley
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection pbuckley@state.pa.us - Roy Hoagland
HOPE Impacts, LLC royhoagland@hopeimpacts.com - Russ Baxter
Virginia Office of Natural Resources russ.baxter@governor.virginia.gov - Susan Marquart
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) susan.marquart@pa.usda.gov - Hank Zygmunt
Resource Dynamics, Inc Hankzyg@gmail.com - Valerie Frances
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Office of Environmental Markets vfrances@oce.usda.gov - Nona McCoy
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) nona.mccoy@wdc.usda.gov - Jennifer Volk
University of Delaware jennvolk@udel.edu - Jack Frye
Chesapeake Bay Commission jfrye@chesbay.us - Melanie Frisch
U.S. Department of the Navy melanie.frisch@navy.mil - James Martin
Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation james.e.martin@dcr.virginia.gov