The Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee works to provide scientific and technical guidance on the Chesapeake Bay Program's efforts to restore and protect the Chesapeake Bay.

Upcoming Meetings

Scope and Purpose

The Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) provides scientific and technical guidance to the Chesapeake Bay Program on measures to restore and protect the Chesapeake Bay. Since its creation in December 1984, the Chesapeake Bay Program’s (CBP) Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) has worked to enhance scientific communication and outreach throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed and beyond. STAC provides independent scientific and technical advice in various ways, including (1) technical reports and position papers, (2) discussion groups, (3) assistance in organizing merit reviews of CBP programs and projects, (4) technical workshops, and (5) interaction between STAC members and the CBP. STAC serves as a liaison between the region's scientific community and the CBP. Through professional and academic contacts and organizational networks of its members, STAC ensures close cooperation among and between the various research institutions and management agencies represented in the Bay watershed.

Projects and Resources

A Comprehensive Evaluation of System Response (CESR)

Achieving Water Quality Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: A Comprehensive Evaluation of System Response (CESR) includes an evaluation of why progress toward meeting the TMDL and water quality standards has been slower than expected and offers options for how progress can be accelerated. This report is a summation of a three year investigation into the 40 year effort to reduce nutrient loads to Chesapeake Bay.

Learn more on the STAC webpage.

CESR Resource Documents

For the CESR Report, three workgroups were formed around the subsystems of the long causal chain that links management actions to their eventual impact on water quality and living resources: nutrient and sediment reductions (watershed), water quality response to nutrient and sediment reductions (estuary) and living resource response to water quality (living resources). Each of these workgroups generated an independent document with a self-determined scope (i.e., workgroups were afforded flexibility to address issues beyond the original objectives).

Learn more on the STAC webpage.

Publications

Using Ecosystem Services to Increase Progress Toward, and Quantify the Benefits of Multiple CBP Outcomes

“Ecosystem services” are the benefits ecosystems provide to people. These benefits include providing food, clean air, clean water, recreation, and many other explicit or intrinsic values to people and communities. Investments in Chesapeake Bay restoration are typically designed to improve water quality, given the legal requirements of the Clean Water Act. The Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement sets goals that encompass a wide range of ecosystem services. A narrow focus on water quality can result in the implementation of practices and policies that maximize nutrient and sediment reductions at the expense of feasible alternatives that offer greater ecosystem services or multiple benefits to living resources and communities.

This workshop was designed to gather input from a diverse array of stakeholders to help shape a coherent framework to identify impactful and durable ways to embed ecosystem services considerations in decision-making. This framework is critical to drive change for both the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and for multiple lagging outcomes in the 2014 Watershed Agreement that provide ecosystem service benefits beyond water quality. As jurisdictions are doubling down on their efforts to meet the TMDL 2025 target date and large investments are being made in environmental restoration and conservation, there is an opportunity to work strategically to achieve a broader set of goals for ecosystems and communities.

Download publication

View details

Using Local Monitoring Results to Inform the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Watershed Model

The workshop, “Using Local Monitoring Results to Inform the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Watershed Model”, was held in March 2023 to provide insight on the scope of local water quality monitoring efforts within and outside of the Bay watershed that could be used to inform the CBWM. Scientists and managers developed recommendations that could be used by modelers for either calibration or knowledge generation to inform the Phase 7 version of the CBWM currently under development for a 2028 decision by the CBP, recommendations for how local monitoring efforts could be designed or altered to better inform the CBWM, and recommendations for how monitored trends could be used in management. The preliminary presentations for the workshop provided essential background information on the CBWM and data used to parameterize it. This information was the foundation for discussions on existing data gaps, the importance of current local monitoring networks, and best practices for developing future monitoring networks.

Download publication

View details

Best Management Practices to Minimize Impacts of Solar Farms on Landscape Hydrology and Water Quality

As solar energy becomes a lower cost and more efficient source of renewable energy, major utility-scale solar panel installations, or solar farms, are being proposed and installed around the Mid-Atlantic region. These solar farms constitute a major land transformation. This transformation is particularly of interest because there can be substantial alteration of land characteristics in the development process, and solar farms also create a unique land cover with impervious surface over pervious surface, generating potential changes in hydrologic and water quality processes. There is currently wide variability in guidance and understanding of best practices relating to the land development and management of solar farms in the Chesapeake Bay region. Thus, a STAC-led workshop gathered speakers and participants from universities, industry, non-governmental organizations, and multiple levels of government across the Chesapeake Bay watershed to address the following questions in April 2023:

  1. What is the state of science on how solar farms impact hydrology and water quality under a range of site and management conditions and project scales?
  2. What are current best management practices and policies, and where in our region are there opportunities for improving recommendations and/or policies?
  3. What are the key gaps with respect to research needs to better answer understand the implications of utility scale solar development.

Download publication

View details
View All

Related Links

STAC Website

Visit the STAC Website for all STAC activities, resources and publications.

Visit link

Members

Larry Sanford (Chair), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Address:
P.O. Box 775
Cambridge, Maryland 21613

Email:  lsanford@umces.edu
Bill Dennison (Vice Chair), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Address:
P.O. BOX 775
Cambridge, Maryland 21613

Email:  dennison@umces.edu
Phone:  (410) 221-2004
Meg Cole (Coordinator), Coordinator, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee, Chesapeake Research Consortium
Address:
645 Contees Wharf Rd.
Edgewater, Maryland 21037

Email:  colem@chesapeake.org
Tou Matthews (Staffer), Projects Manager, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), Chesapeake Research Consortium
Address:
645 Contees Wharf Road
Edgewater, Maryland 21037

Email:  matthewst@chesapeake.org
Phone:  (443) 823-1752
Erin Letavic, HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, INC.
Address:
2320 S Dupont Hwy
Dover, Delaware 19901

Email:  Chris.Brosch@state.de.us
Phone:  302-698-4555
Chris Brosch, Delaware Department of Agriculture
Address:
2320 S. Dupont Highway
Dover, Delaware 19901

Email:  chris.brosch@state.de.us
Phone:  (302) 698-4555
Craig Beyrouty, University of Maryland
Address:
7998 Regents Drive
College Park, Maryland 20742

Email:  beyrouty@umd.edu
Phone:  301-405-2072
Katherine Bunting-Howarth, New York Sea Grant
Address:
New York Sea Grant 112 Rice Hall Cornell University
Ithaca, New York 14853

Email:  keb264@cornell.edu
Phone:  607-255-2832
Weixing Zhu, Binghamton University
Address:


Email:  wxzhu@binghamton.edu
Phone:  607-777-3218
Shirley Clark, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State)
Address:
W236F Olmstead Building
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057

Email:  sec16@psu.edu
Phone:  717-948-6127
Ben Hayes, Bucknell University
Address:


Email:  brh010@bucknell.edu
Phone:  570-577-1830
Ellen Gilinsky, Ellen Gilinsky, LLC
Address:
1713 Windingridge Court
Richmond, Virginia 23238

Email:  ellen5753@gmail.com
Phone:  804-387-1875
Kirk Havens, Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS)
Address:
PO Box 1346
Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062

Email:  kirk@vims.edu
Phone:  (804) 684-7386
Jason Hubbart, West Virginia University
Address:
1098 Agricultural Sciences Building
Morgantown, West Virginia 26506

Email:  Jason.Hubbart@mail.wvu.edu
Phone:  304-293-2472
Celso Ferreira, George Mason University
Address:


Email:  cferrei3@gmu.edu
Jeni Keisman, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Address:
5522 Research Park Drive
Baltimore, Maryland 21228

Email:  jkeisman@usgs.gov
Phone:  (410) 267-5729
Scott Knoche, Morgan State University Patuxent Environmental & Aquatic Research Laboratory
Address:


Email:  scott.knoche@morgan.edu
Ellen Kohl, St. Mary's College of Maryland
Address:


Email:  eakohl@smcm.edu
David Martin, The Nature Conservancy
Address:


Email:  david.martin@tnc.org
Efeturi Oghenekaro, District of Columbia Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE)
Address:
1200 First Street NE, 5th Floor
Washington, District of Columbia 20002

Email:  efeturi.oghenekaro@dc.gov
Leah Palm-Forster, University of Delaware
Address:


Email:  leahhp@udel.edu
Kenny Rose, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Address:


Email:  krose@umces.edu
Tess Thompson, Virginia Tech
Address:


Email:  tthompson@vt.edu
Anthony Buda, USDA Agricultural Research Service
Address:


Email:  anthony.buda@ars.usda.gov
Mark Monaco, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Address:


Email:  mark.monaco@noaa.gov
Greg Noe, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Address:
12201 Sunrise Valley Dr
Reston, Virginia 20192

Email:  gnoe@usgs.gov
Michael Runge, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Address:


Email:  mrunge@usgs.gov
Leon Tillman, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
Address:
339 Busch's Frontage Road, Suite 301
Annapolis, Maryland 21409

Email:  leon.tillman@usda.gov
Phone:  (443) 875-7169
Amir Sharifi, District of Columbia Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE)
Address:


Email:  amirreza.sharifi@dc.gov
Charles Bott, Hampton Roads Sanitation District
Address:


Email:  cbott@hrsd.com
Christine Kirchhoff, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State)
Address:


Email:  cxk475@psu.edu
Emily Trentacoste, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Address:
410 Severn Avenue
Annapolis, Maryland 21403

Email:  trentacoste.emily@epa.gov
Phone:  (410) 267-5797
Joe Wood, Chesapeake Bay Foundation
Address:
1108E Main Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219

Email:  jwood@cbf.org
KC Filippino, Hampton Roads Planning District Commission
Address:
723 Woodlake Dr
Cheasapeake, Virginia 23320

Email:  kfilippino@hrpdcva.gov
John Dawes, The Commons
Address:


Email:  dawes@ourcommoncode.org
Matt Baker, University of Maryland Baltimore County
Address:


Email:  mbaker@umbc.edu
Kathy DeBusk Gee, Longwood University
Address:


Email:  geekd@longwood.edu
Joe Reustle, Hampton University
Address:


Email:  joseph.reustle@hamptonu.edu
Yusuke Kuwayama, University of Maryland Baltimore County
Address:


Email:  kuwayama@umbc.edu
Valerie Were, Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere
Address:


Email:  valerie.were@gmail.com
Theo Lim, Virginia Tech
Address:


Email:  tclim@vt.edu
Kathy Boomer, Foundation for Food & Agriculture Research
Address:
8198 New Bridge Road


Email:  kboomer@foundationfar.org