Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee
Upcoming Meetings
STAC Workshop: CBP Climate Change Modeling III: Post-2025 decisions - May 2024
Tuesday, May 7, 2024 (all day)STAC June 2024 Quarterly Meeting
Tuesday, June 4, 2024 from 9:30am - Wednesday, June 5, 2024 from 1:00pmScope and Purpose
The Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) provides scientific and technical guidance to the Chesapeake Bay Program on measures to restore and protect the Chesapeake Bay. Since its creation in December 1984, the Chesapeake Bay Program’s (CBP) Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) has worked to enhance scientific communication and outreach throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed and beyond. STAC provides independent scientific and technical advice in various ways, including (1) technical reports and position papers, (2) discussion groups, (3) assistance in organizing merit reviews of CBP programs and projects, (4) technical workshops, and (5) interaction between STAC members and the CBP. STAC serves as a liaison between the region's scientific community and the CBP. Through professional and academic contacts and organizational networks of its members, STAC ensures close cooperation among and between the various research institutions and management agencies represented in the Bay watershed.
Projects and Resources
A Comprehensive Evaluation of System Response (CESR)
Achieving Water Quality Goals in the Chesapeake Bay: A Comprehensive Evaluation of System Response (CESR) includes an evaluation of why progress toward meeting the TMDL and water quality standards has been slower than expected and offers options for how progress can be accelerated. This report is a summation of a three year investigation into the 40 year effort to reduce nutrient loads to Chesapeake Bay.
Learn more on the STAC webpage.
CESR Resource Documents
For the CESR Report, three workgroups were formed around the subsystems of the long causal chain that links management actions to their eventual impact on water quality and living resources: nutrient and sediment reductions (watershed), water quality response to nutrient and sediment reductions (estuary) and living resource response to water quality (living resources). Each of these workgroups generated an independent document with a self-determined scope (i.e., workgroups were afforded flexibility to address issues beyond the original objectives).
Learn more on the STAC webpage.
Publications
Using Ecosystem Services to Increase Progress Toward, and Quantify the Benefits of Multiple CBP Outcomes
Published on February 23, 2024“Ecosystem services” are the benefits ecosystems provide to people. These benefits include providing food, clean air, clean water, recreation, and many other explicit or intrinsic values to people and communities. Investments in Chesapeake Bay restoration are typically designed to improve water quality, given the legal requirements of the Clean Water Act. The Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement sets goals that encompass a wide range of ecosystem services. A narrow focus on water quality can result in the implementation of practices and policies that maximize nutrient and sediment reductions at the expense of feasible alternatives that offer greater ecosystem services or multiple benefits to living resources and communities.
This workshop was designed to gather input from a diverse array of stakeholders to help shape a coherent framework to identify impactful and durable ways to embed ecosystem services considerations in decision-making. This framework is critical to drive change for both the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and for multiple lagging outcomes in the 2014 Watershed Agreement that provide ecosystem service benefits beyond water quality. As jurisdictions are doubling down on their efforts to meet the TMDL 2025 target date and large investments are being made in environmental restoration and conservation, there is an opportunity to work strategically to achieve a broader set of goals for ecosystems and communities.
View detailsUsing Local Monitoring Results to Inform the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Watershed Model
Published on January 4, 2024The workshop, “Using Local Monitoring Results to Inform the Chesapeake Bay Program’s Watershed Model”, was held in March 2023 to provide insight on the scope of local water quality monitoring efforts within and outside of the Bay watershed that could be used to inform the CBWM. Scientists and managers developed recommendations that could be used by modelers for either calibration or knowledge generation to inform the Phase 7 version of the CBWM currently under development for a 2028 decision by the CBP, recommendations for how local monitoring efforts could be designed or altered to better inform the CBWM, and recommendations for how monitored trends could be used in management. The preliminary presentations for the workshop provided essential background information on the CBWM and data used to parameterize it. This information was the foundation for discussions on existing data gaps, the importance of current local monitoring networks, and best practices for developing future monitoring networks.
View detailsBest Management Practices to Minimize Impacts of Solar Farms on Landscape Hydrology and Water Quality
Published on January 3, 2024As solar energy becomes a lower cost and more efficient source of renewable energy, major utility-scale solar panel installations, or solar farms, are being proposed and installed around the Mid-Atlantic region. These solar farms constitute a major land transformation. This transformation is particularly of interest because there can be substantial alteration of land characteristics in the development process, and solar farms also create a unique land cover with impervious surface over pervious surface, generating potential changes in hydrologic and water quality processes. There is currently wide variability in guidance and understanding of best practices relating to the land development and management of solar farms in the Chesapeake Bay region. Thus, a STAC-led workshop gathered speakers and participants from universities, industry, non-governmental organizations, and multiple levels of government across the Chesapeake Bay watershed to address the following questions in April 2023:
- What is the state of science on how solar farms impact hydrology and water quality under a range of site and management conditions and project scales?
- What are current best management practices and policies, and where in our region are there opportunities for improving recommendations and/or policies?
- What are the key gaps with respect to research needs to better answer understand the implications of utility scale solar development.
Related Links
STAC Website
Visit the STAC Website for all STAC activities, resources and publications.
Members
Larry Sanford (Chair), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Bill Dennison (Vice Chair), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Meg Cole (Coordinator), Coordinator, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee, Chesapeake Research Consortium
Tou Matthews (Staffer), Projects Manager, Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC), Chesapeake Research Consortium
645 Contees Wharf Road
Edgewater, Maryland 21037
Email: matthewst@chesapeake.org
Phone: (443) 823-1752
Erin Letavic, HERBERT, ROWLAND & GRUBIC, INC.
Chris Brosch, Delaware Department of Agriculture
2320 S. Dupont Highway
Dover, Delaware 19901
Email: chris.brosch@state.de.us
Phone: (302) 698-4555
Craig Beyrouty, University of Maryland
Katherine Bunting-Howarth, New York Sea Grant
New York Sea Grant 112 Rice Hall Cornell University
Ithaca, New York 14853
Email: keb264@cornell.edu
Phone: 607-255-2832
Weixing Zhu, Binghamton University
Shirley Clark, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State)
W236F Olmstead Building
Middletown, Pennsylvania 17057
Email: sec16@psu.edu
Phone: 717-948-6127
Ben Hayes, Bucknell University
Ellen Gilinsky, Ellen Gilinsky, LLC
1713 Windingridge Court
Richmond, Virginia 23238
Email: ellen5753@gmail.com
Phone: 804-387-1875
Kirk Havens, Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS)
Jason Hubbart, West Virginia University
1098 Agricultural Sciences Building
Morgantown, West Virginia 26506
Email: Jason.Hubbart@mail.wvu.edu
Phone: 304-293-2472
Celso Ferreira, George Mason University
Jeni Keisman, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
5522 Research Park Drive
Baltimore, Maryland 21228
Email: jkeisman@usgs.gov
Phone: (410) 267-5729
Scott Knoche, Morgan State University Patuxent Environmental & Aquatic Research Laboratory
Ellen Kohl, St. Mary's College of Maryland
David Martin, The Nature Conservancy
Efeturi Oghenekaro, District of Columbia Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE)
1200 First Street NE, 5th Floor
Washington, District of Columbia 20002
Email: efeturi.oghenekaro@dc.gov
Leah Palm-Forster, University of Delaware
Kenny Rose, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
Tess Thompson, Virginia Tech
Anthony Buda, USDA Agricultural Research Service
Mark Monaco, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
Greg Noe, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Michael Runge, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
Leon Tillman, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
339 Busch's Frontage Road, Suite 301
Annapolis, Maryland 21409
Email: leon.tillman@usda.gov
Phone: (443) 875-7169
Amir Sharifi, District of Columbia Department of Energy & Environment (DOEE)
Charles Bott, Hampton Roads Sanitation District
Christine Kirchhoff, Pennsylvania State University (Penn State)
Emily Trentacoste, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
410 Severn Avenue
Annapolis, Maryland 21403
Email: trentacoste.emily@epa.gov
Phone: (410) 267-5797