The Chesapeake Bay is an incredibly complex system—and funding its restoration can seem as complicated as the ecosystem itself. Numerous federal agencies, state and local governments, non-governmental organizations and private interests financially support the restoration effort described in the commitments of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement. The Budget and Finance Workgroup supports the Chesapeake Bay Program in achieving the goals established in the Watershed Agreement by serving as a focal point for coordination, innovation and accurate reporting related to budgeting and program finance.
Coordinating the Effort
Pollution in the Chesapeake Bay watershed comes from hundreds of wastewater treatment plants, thousands of farms and millions of people who reside and recreate in the watershed. A comprehensive restoration strategy such as the one pursued by the Chesapeake Bay Program may be the only effective way to address an expansive ecosystem that integrates developed areas, agriculture and natural resources as thoroughly as in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Funding provided through the Chesapeake Bay Program is a key factor in leveraging funds from a variety of sources and facilitates the efforts of many partners.
Since its formation in 1983, several written agreements have guided the Chesapeake Bay Program’s efforts to reduce pollution and restore the ecosystem. By setting collaborative, quantifiable goals, any stakeholder—from federal and state agencies to local watershed organizations—can do their part to achieve the outcome. As such, although we can measure progress toward achieving our collective goals, it can be difficult to quantify the extent of financial resources that support the entire Chesapeake Bay restoration effort. However, specific information is available for contributions at the level of federal and state agencies.
Federal and State Budgets
Many federal and state agencies participate in the Chesapeake Bay Program partnership. Through the authority of the Chesapeake Bay Accountability and Recovery Act, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) issues a Chesapeake Bay Restoration Spending Crosscut Report each year, which indicates state and federal partners’ investments in environmental restoration. A breakdown of this federal and state spending is available through ChesapeakeProgress.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
The Clean Water Act, Section 117, provides authority for the Chesapeake Bay Program and directs the EPA to maintain a Chesapeake Bay Program Office (CBPO) and to coordinate many of the activities of the program. The CBPO is located in Annapolis, Maryland, and is supported and staffed by many federal, state, academic and non-governmental partners.
Through an annual appropriation from Congress, EPA supports scientific, analytical, communication, outreach and coordinating functions to make the Bay partnership work. Close to two-thirds of the EPA funding for the Chesapeake Bay Program is provided directly to state and local partners for watershed restoration, protection and monitoring.
EPA funding is provided annually to states, local governments, non-governmental organizations and academic institutions through grant programs, including:
- State Implementation and Monitoring Grants: Multiple types of grants provide significant financial support to Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, West Virginia and D.C. to put restoration work in to action. EPA CBPO funding supports the following grant programs:
- Chesapeake Bay Implementation Grants (CBIG) support the six states and D.C. work toward meeting the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement, with particular emphasis on programs to reduce nutrient and sediment pollution.
- Chesapeake Bay Regulatory and Accountability Program (CBRAP) Grants help the jurisdictions implement and expand their regulatory, accountability, assessment, compliance and enforcement capabilities to reduce nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment loads to meet the water quality goals of the Watershed Agreement and the Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL).
- Monitoring grants support the six states and D.C.’s work to monitor and assess water quality, habitat conditions, nutrient and sediment pollution and more, as well as support data analysis and interpretation of trends.
- Local implementation funding is used by counties, municipalities, cities, towns, townships and local public authorities or districts to reduce nutrient and sediment loads through key sectors like land development and agriculture.
- Small Watershed Grants (SWG): These EPA grants, currently administered and leveraged by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF), are awarded to local governments and non-governmental organizations working to protect and improve local waters and habitats across the Bay watershed while building citizen-based resource stewardship.
- Innovative Nutrient and Sediment Reduction Grants (INSR): These larger EPA grants, currently administered and leveraged by NFWF, support innovative solutions to reduce or eliminate nutrient and sediment pollution to the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries.
- Technical Assistance and General Assistance Grants: These grants are awarded competitively to nonprofit organizations, state and local governments, academic institutions and others to implement the goals of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement. Additionally, a grant agreement with the Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland assists local communities in developing financing strategies to pay for water quality improvement.
Other major components of EPA support for the Chesapeake Bay Program include:
- Office and Personnel: EPA funds support salary and benefits for CBPO staff members and the physical office space needed to support the vast network of scientists, researchers and other experts.
- Contracts and Inter-agency Agreements: Funding brings experts from other federal agencies, academic institutions and non-governmental organizations to the Bay Program office for projects ranging from agricultural conservation practices to wastewater treatment plant upgrades, ensuring that our restoration efforts incorporate expertise from throughout the watershed.
- Scientific Analysis and Decision-Support Tools: The scientific functions of the program include modeling, trends analysis, monitoring and analytical tool development, information technology, which are essential to making effective decisions about the restoration effort.
Other Federal Funding
Other federal agencies work closely together as part of the Chesapeake Bay Program to coordinate efforts and resources and interact with state partners. Funding amounts can be found via ChesapeakeProgress.
Chesapeake Bay Program partners recognize the important role finance strategies play in the restoration effort. Throughout the Bay Program’s history, several written agreements—such as the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement, signed in 2014—have guided our partners’ work to reduce pollution and restore the ecosystem. Signatories use diverse types of financing approaches they deem appropriate to meet these goals, such as Public-Private Partnerships (P3), state-mandated trust funds, state and local stormwater fees and mechanisms like water quality trading. Each partner is able to employ the approaches that are best suited to their distinct needs as they work to collaboratively reach the agreement’s objectives.
Resources and Reports
Over the years, several reports and organizations have conducted economic evaluations of the Bay and of efforts to restore the estuary, as well as other financing-related studies:
- Commercial fishing and outdoor recreation benefits of water quality improvements in the Chesapeake Bay – National Center for Environmental Economics (March 2017)
- Modeling the Property Price Impact of Water Quality in 14 Chesapeake Bay Counties – Ecological Economics (February 2017)
- Options for Financing Chesapeake Bay Restoration in Pennsylvania – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (November 2016)
- Strategies for Financing Water Quality Restoration in Delaware – Environmental Finance Center at the Universityof Maryland (June 2017)
- Strategies for Financing Chesapeake Bay Restoration in Virginia – Environmental Finance Center at the Universityof Maryland (August 2017)
- Improving Water Quality in an Iconic Estuary: An Internal Meta-analysis of Property Value Impacts Around the Chesapeake Bay –Environmental and Resource Economics (November 2016)
- Financial Incentives for Water Quality Protection and Restoration on Agricultural Lands in Pennsylvania – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (September 2016)
- Chesapeake Bay Environmental Finance Symposium Recommendations and Final Report – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (August 2016)
- Final Report: Financing a Resilient Annapolis, Maryland – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (July 2016)
- Final Report: Financing a Resilient Prince George’s County, Maryland – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (July 2016)
- Advancing Regional Stormwater Management in York County, Pennsylvania – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (May 2016)
- A Stated Preference Study of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed Lakes – U.S. EPA and National Center for Environmental Economics (November 2015)
- Chesapeake Executive Council Resolution #2015-2: Financing the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay – Chesapeake Executive Council (July 2015)
- Providing Financing Technical Assistance to Chesapeake Bay Communities: Final Project Report – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (June 2015)
- Community Based Public-Private Partnerships (CBP3s) and Alternative Market-Based Tools for Integrated Green Stormwater Infrastructure – U.S. EPA (April 2015)
- Maryland’s Chesapeake Bay Restoration Financing Strategy Final Report – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (February 2015)
- The Economic Benefits of Cleaning Up the Chesapeake – Chesapeake Bay Foundation (October 2014)
- Estimating Operations and Maintenance for BMPs in the Northern Shenandoah Valley Region (Excel Spreadsheet) – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (June 2016)
- Environmental Finance Center Project Summaries & Links – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (March 2014)
- Virginia Staffing Plan Workbook and Tool (Excel Spreadsheet) – Environmental Finance Center at the University of Maryland (June 2013)
- The Cost of a Clean Bay: Assessing Funding Needs Throughout the Watershed – Chesapeake Bay Commission (January 2003)
- Saving a National Treasure: Financing the Cleanup of the Chesapeake Bay – A Report to the Chesapeake Executive Council From the Chesapeake Bay Blue Ribbon Finance Panel (October 2004)
- Cost-Effective Strategies for the Bay: Six Smart Investments for Nutrient and Sediment Reduction – Chesapeake Bay Commission (December 2004)
For more information on the Chesapeake Bay Program budget, please contact James Edward, Deputy Director, at firstname.lastname@example.org.