Modeling Workgroup Projects

New web page summarizes the priorities and identifies lead researchers for each effort. The descriptions are brief with links to more detailed workplans.

These updated modeling tools will be used by the Chesapeake Bay Program partnership to inform decisions related to the nutrient and sediment reduction goals outlined in the revised Watershed Agreement.

Tributary Summary Reports and geonarratives on trends and analyses for the 12 major tributary basins in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

This project entry serves as a home for Phase 6 Watershed Model documentation.

Resources for climate change projections and scenarios, modeling documentation and decision-support materials, STAC peer review documents, policy option briefing memorandums and decision-support materials, and  partnership decision-support presentations.

This project page is the repository for documents and files related to the peer review of the Phase 6 Water Quality and Sediment Transport Model (WQSTM). Please email Kyle Hinson (khinson@chesapeakebay.net) with any questions you may have.

Documentation

All documentation for the Phase 6 WQSTM can be found in the Draft 2017 documentation and its appendices. Information on key scenarios can also be found in the Phase 6 Key Scenarios pdf file.

Additional Materials

Further attachments contain all the presentations that were presented for the STAC peer review.

This section contains resources and publications including prior reviews that may be employed in reviewing the Phase 6 Water Quality and Sediment Transport Model (WQSTM).

An exploration of how shallow-water models can improve shallow-water simulations of dissolved oxygen, chlorophyll a, suspended solids and water clarity to better understand the impacts of alternative management strategies on water quality and living resources in the tidal Chesapeake Bay.

CMAQ Review Process: During the past three years, CMAS, in collaboration with EPA scientists, has organized two CMAQ review panel meetings etc. The first CMAQ review meeting was held during December 2003. The second meeting was held during May 2005. The review process usually starts by inviting a number of key scientists to participate in the process. The scientists are selected based on their expertise in accordance with the focus of the review session. After reviewing numerous reports and articles and completing their meeting in Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, the review panel prepares a comprehensive report on their findings and recommendations. EPA then responds to the comments of the reviewers. Final review reports are posted below.

This project entry serves as a home for Phase 5 Watershed Model documentation.

The CBP models follow the peer review guidance developed by EPA’s Science Advisory Board (SAB) for regulatory models: http://www.epa.gov/spc/pdfs/modelpr.pdf and the peer review guidance developed by the Ecological Society of America and endorsed by the American College of Preventive Medicine, American Fisheries Society, American Institute of Biological Sciences, American Public Health Association, American Society of Agronomy, American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Association of Teachers of Preventive Medicine, Crop Science Society of America, Ecological Society of America, Estuarine Research Federation, Institute of Food Technologists, Soil Science Society of America, Society for Conservation Biology

• http://www.acpm.org/2004-033(H).htm

This project entry serves as a home for Phase 4 Watershed Model documentation.

This project entry serves as a home for Phase 1 and Phase 2 Watershed Model documentation.

This project entry serves as a home for documentation related to the initial Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model.