Integrated Trends Analysis Team
Upcoming Meetings
Integrated Trends Analysis Team Meeting - June 2023
Wednesday, June 28, 2023 from 10:00am - 12:00pmIntegrated Trends Analysis Team Meeting - July 2023
Wednesday, July 26, 2023 from 10:00am - 12:00pmIntegrated Trends Analysis Team Meeting - August 2023
Wednesday, August 23, 2023 from 10:00am - 12:00pmScope and Purpose
The Integrated Trends Analysis Team aims to combine the efforts of the Chesapeake Bay Program analysts with those of investigators in governmental, academic, and non-profit organizations to identify potential research synergies and collaborations that will enhance our understanding of spatial and temporal patterns in water quality.
Specific Goals:
(1) Gather researchers and analysts from various governmental, academic, non-profit, and private organizations for biannual meetings to identify the broad scope of on-going work related to trends and patterns of water quality in the Chesapeake watershed and estuary.
(2) Discover previously un-identified linkages among the ongoing research activities of participating individuals and organizations.
(3) Develop a standard set of analysis tools that can be applied in any relevant ecosystem within the Chesapeake watershed and estuary.
(4) Foster increased collaboration and awareness of ongoing research.
(5) Provide a forum for bringing findings to the broader Chesapeake Bay management community.
Membership in the Integrated Trends Analysis Team is currently not formally defined. If you would like to receive invitations to upcoming meetings, contact Alexander Gunnerson (agunnerson@chesapeakebay.net) to request that your name and email address be added to the Team's distribution list.
Projects and Resources
Tributary Summaries
The Chesapeake Bay Program and its partners produce tributary basin summary reports for the Bay’s 12 major tributaries using tidal monitoring data from more than 130 monitoring stations throughout the mainstem and tidal portions of the Bay. These reports use water quality sample data to summarize 1) How tidal water quality (TN, TP, DO, Chlorophyll a, Secchi Depth) has changed over time, 2) How and which factors may influence water quality change over time, and 3) Recent research connecting observed changes in aquatic conditions to its drivers.
These documents can be found on the CAST webpage here.
Maps of 2021 Tidal Water Quality Change
The Chesapeake Bay Program (CBP), Maryland Department of Natural Resources (MDDNR), Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ), Old Dominion University (ODU), District of Columbia Department of Energy and the Environment (DC DOEE), and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (MWCOG) collaborate annually to produce bay-wide summaries of water quality trends in the tidal waters. These annual estimates at more than 150 stations for nutrients, dissolved oxygen, Secchi depth, chlorophyll a and other parameters help gauge the health of the bay and identify changes due to management actions and climate. The 2021 Tidal Trends Summary document attached below summarizes these results. Additional tools are available to explore the tidal trends results including baytrendsmap and the Watershed Data Dashboard, Tidal page.
- 2021 Tidal Trends Summary (pdf - 2.547 MB)
1. Long-Term Change
Observed change in water quality by station from the beginning of the period to 2021. The beginning of the period varies for stations but is indicated in the bottom right corner of the map.
- Total Nitrogen Surface Annual Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 467.547 KB)
- Total Phosphorus Surface Annual Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 474.563 KB)
- Chlorophyll-a Surface Spring Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 468.456 KB)
- Chlorophyll-a Surface Summer Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 478.301 KB)
- Secchi Depth Annual Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 485.687 KB)
- Total Suspended Solids Surface Annual 1999-2021 Change (png - 475.476 KB)
- Water Temperature Surface Annual Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 480.091 KB)
- Dissolved Oxygen Bottom Summer Long-Term Change 2021 (png - 456.576 KB)
2. Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change
Change in water quality by station computed under the condition of average freshwater flow into the Chesapeake Bay over the long-term. This approach answers the question: “What would the change in water quality have been if flow had been average?”
- Total Nitrogen Surface Annual Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 468.272 KB)
- Total Phosphorus Surface Annual Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 471.729 KB)
- Chlorophyll-a Surface Spring Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 468.26 KB)
- Chlorophyll-a Surface Summer Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 475.396 KB)
- Secchi Depth Annual Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 490.574 KB)
- Total Suspended Solids Surface Annual 1999-2021 Flow-Adjusted Change (png - 483.28 KB)
- Water Temperature Surface Annual Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 485.517 KB)
- Dissolved Oxygen Bottom Summer Long-Term Flow-Adjusted Change 2021 (png - 458.898 KB)
3. Short-Term Change
Observed change in water quality by station over the last 10 years (2012-2021).
- Total Nitrogen Surface Annual Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 437.692 KB)
- Total Phosphorus Surface Annual Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 436.641 KB)
- Chlorophyll-a Surface Spring Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 475.341 KB)
- Chlorophyll-a Surface Summer Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 467.769 KB)
- Secchi Depth Annual Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 452.088 KB)
- Total Suspended Solids Surface Annual 2012-2021 Change (png - 471.27 KB)
- Water Temperature Surface Annual Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 453.6 KB)
- Dissolved Oxygen Bottom Summer Short-Term Change 2021 (png - 425.713 KB)
Publications
Progress toward the Restoration of Chesapeake Bay in Time and Space
Three decades of monitoring in Chesapeake Bay and tributary rivers has allowed for an examination of the spatial and temporal patterns of water quality change in response to watershed restoration activities. This review of past monitoring data has revealed clear signs of successful water quality remediation in some Chesapeake regions. Upgrades to waste water treatment plants (WWTP) have led to measurable reductions in nutrient concentrations and algal biomass, with associated recoveries of submerged aquatic vegetation and reductions in sediment and nutrient levels. Point-source related improvements were observed in waters local to the WWTP facility, which are generally in oligohaline and tidal freshwater regions of tributaries. Reductions in atmospheric deposition of nitrogen within the Bay watershed has resulted inmarked reductions in nitrogen inputs from the Susquehanna and Potomac Rivers, and these reductions in watershed input have resulted in lower concentrations within the estuary. Coastal plain watersheds with high agricultural intensity continue to yield high amounts of nutrients, and water quality has not improved in the receiving waters of many of these tributaries. Signs of eutrophication remediation are clearest where nutrient load reductions are large and local. In more seaward estuarine reaches, recovery from eutrophication appears to be season- and regionspecific, where the late growing season period in high-salinity waters, which is most vulnerable to nutrient limitation and oxygen replenishment, appear to have recovered first. These findings suggest a refinement of our existing conceptual models of the eutrophication process in Chesapeake Bay, where time of year and proximity to nutrient sources are important to understanding spatial and temporal variation in recovery.
View detailsProgress toward the Restoration of Chesapeake Bay in Time and Space - Executive Summary
Three decades of monitoring in Chesapeake Bay and tributary rivers has allowed for an examination of the spatial and temporal patterns of water quality change in response to watershed restoration activities. This review of past monitoring data has revealed clear signs of successful water quality remediation in some Chesapeake regions. Upgrades to waste water treatment plants (WWTP) have led to measurable reductions in nutrient concentrations and algal biomass, with associated recoveries of submerged aquatic vegetation and reductions in sediment and nutrient levels. Point-source related improvements were observed in waters local to the WWTP facility, which are generally in oligohaline and tidal freshwater regions of tributaries. Reductions in atmospheric deposition of nitrogen within the Bay watershed has resulted inmarked reductions in nitrogen inputs from the Susquehanna and Potomac Rivers, and these reductions in watershed input have resulted in lower concentrations within the estuary. Coastal plain watersheds with high agricultural intensity continue to yield high amounts of nutrients, and water quality has not improved in the receiving waters of many of these tributaries. Signs of eutrophication remediation are clearest where nutrient load reductions are large and local. In more seaward estuarine reaches, recovery from eutrophication appears to be season- and regionspecific, where the late growing season period in high-salinity waters, which is most vulnerable to nutrient limitation and oxygen replenishment, appear to have recovered first. These findings suggest a refinement of our existing conceptual models of the eutrophication process in Chesapeake Bay, where time of year and proximity to nutrient sources are important to understanding spatial and temporal variation in recovery.
View detailsNutrient Improvements in Chesapeake Bay: Direct Effect of Load Reductions and Implications for Coast
Published on December 21, 2021Link to the document.
Citation: Rebecca R. Murphy, Jennifer Keisman, Jon Harcum, Renee R. Karrh, Mike Lane, Elgin S. Perry, and Qian Zhang, 2021. "Nutrient Improvements in Chesapeake Bay: Direct Effect of Load Reductions and Implications for Coastal Management", Environmental Science & Technology 2022 56 (1), 260-270. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.1c05388
View detailsMembers
Breck Sullivan (Coordinator), Scientific, Technical Assessment & Reporting Coordinator, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
1750 Forest Drive Suite 130
Annapolis, maryland 21401
Email: bsullivan@chesapeakebay.net
Phone: (410) 267-5788
Kaylyn Gootman (Coordinator), Life Scientist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1750 Forest Drive Suite 130
Annapolis, maryland 21401
Email: Gootman.Kaylyn@epa.gov
Phone: (410) 267-5705
Alex Gunnerson (Staffer), Scientific, Technical Assessment, and Reporting Team Staffer, Chesapeake Research Consortium
Rebecca Murphy, Water Quality Analyst, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
1750 Forest Drive Suite 130
Annapolis, maryland 21401
Email: rmurphy@chesapeakebay.net
Phone: (410) 267-9837
Qian Zhang, Data Analyst, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science
1750 Forest Drive Suite 130
Annapolis, maryland 21401
Email: qzhang@chesapeakebay.net
Phone: (410) 267-5794
Peter Tango, Monitoring Coordinator, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
1750 Forest Drive Suite 130
Annapolis, maryland 21401
Email: ptango@chesapeakebay.net
Phone: (410) 267-9875