Stream Health Workgroup
The Stream Health Workgroup is dedicated to creating positive impacts on streams within the Chesapeake Bay watershed by improving the health and the ecological integrity of at least an additional 4,340 (approximately 3%) nontidal stream miles every six years.
Meetings
Stream Health Workgroup Meeting - June 2026
Stream Health Workgroup Meeting - August 2026
Stream Health Workgroup Meeting - October 2026
Stream Health Workgroup Meeting - April 2026
Stream Health Workgroup Meeting - February 2026
Stream Health Workgroup Meeting - December 2025
About
Streams are the lifeline of the watershed, connecting each of us to the symbiotic reality of its watershed. Streams provide unique habitat for fish, waterbirds, amphibians, mammals and a place for us to recreate and appreciate nature. However, human-induced and natural stressors often threaten the health of these places, risking the well-being of the watershed many call home.
The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Stream Health Workgroup aims to affect overall positive change on streams in the Chesapeake Bay watershed by coordinating expert input on restoration techniques, determining the biological health of streams throughout the watershed, providing a venue for sharing new scientific findings and tracking progress toward the Stream Health Outcome of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement. Over the past 15 years the Stream Health Workgroup has taken on the quest to research how stream restoration practices and water quality improvement best management practices (BMPs) can best maximize biological uplift.
What Makes a Stream Healthy?
Stream health is defined by the biological health of the stream measured by the Chesapeake Benthic Index of Biological Integrity (Chessie BIBI). The Chessie BIBI is a measure of benthic invertebrates within streams, which serve as the base of the food chain and determine the likelihood of being able to support higher level wildlife such as fish, waterbirds and amphibians.
Explore the most recent Chessie BIBI data release from our partner, the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin.
Limitations of the Chessie BIBI
While the Chessie BIBI is an excellent indicator of the biotic community, it does not necessarily capture local improvements in hydraulics, geomorphology or physicochemical qualities that drive ecological uplift of stream restoration projects and other watershed BMPs. It is derived from comprehensive data collected over six-year increments and as such, benefits or negative impacts from management interventions take a long time to be observed in the data. Additionally, the Chessie BIBI alone cannot identify the cause of stream biotic communities impairments that may be addressed with targeted management actions.
Due to these limitations, the workgroup is exploring including other non-biological metrics and their data availability throughout the watershed to complement the Chessie BIBI.
Get Involved
If you would like to join the workgroup as a member or an interested party, please reach out to the workgroup chairs and/or staffer.
Projects
Non-Biotic Stream Health Indicators
In ProgressThe Stream Health Workgroup is exploring additional stream corridor metrics to allow analysis at a whole watershed-scale, a more rapid reporting timeframe and the ability to attribute causes of biological impairment to inform management interventions.
Recommendations for Developing Hydromorphology Indicators with GIS Data
CompleteThis project advanced efforts to understand drivers of stream health and to develop non-biological metrics for characterizing stream health's response to management practices.
Management Approaches to Reduce Stressors of Stream Health
CompleteThis study explored how best management practices designed to reduce nutrient and sediment loads can also address key stressors on stream health.
Identifying Key Stressors Driving Biological Impairment in Freshwater Streams in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
CompleteExamining key stressors behind biological impairment in Chesapeake Bay streams through research and regulatory insights.
Literature Review: Building Climate Resilience in Stream Restoration Practices
In ProgressThis review of existing research examines the resilience of stream restoration practices in a changing climate.
Publications
Stream Health Workgroup Technical Reference
Publication date:This document provides a brief history of the Stream Health Workgroup’s watershed-scale publications, as well as context for important terms used in the workgroup's work.
View document [PDF, 318.7 KB] Stream Health Workgroup Technical Reference
2024-2026 Stream Health Workplan
Publication date:This two-year work plan outlines the steps the workgroup will implement to promote progress toward the Stream Health Outcome, as defined in the 2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement.
View document [PDF, 180.8 KB] 2024-2026 Stream Health Workplan
2024-2025 Stream Health Management Strategy - v.4
Publication date:This management strategy outlines methods for attaining the Stream Health Outcome, as defined in the 2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement.
View document [PDF, 567.3 KB] 2024-2025 Stream Health Management Strategy - v.4
The State of the Science and Practice of Stream Restoration in the Chesapeake: Lessons Learned to Inform Better Implementation, Assessment, and Outcomes
Publication date:This report summarizes the proceedings of a workshop that reviewed and distilled lessons learned from past stream corridor restoration projects to improve future restoration outcomes.
Stream Biological Health in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Publication date:This report provides a numeric value for the stream health baseline referenced in the 2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement, as well as evidence of improving trends in stream health.
View document [PDF, 2.4 MB] Stream Biological Health in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed
Our Watershed Agreement Goals & Outcomes
Thriving Habitat, Fisheries & Wildlife Goal
Our Members
- Alison Santoro (Chair)
Maryland Department of Natural Resources alisona.santoro@maryland.gov - Brock Reggi (Chair)
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Brock.Reggi@deq.virginia.gov - Nick Staten (Staffer)
Chesapeake Research Consortium staten.nick@epa.gov - Josh Burch
District of Columbia Department of Energy & Environment josh.burch@dc.gov - Brittany Sturgis
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control brittany.sturgis@delaware.gov - Denise Clearwater
Maryland Department of the Environment dclearwater@mde.state.md.us - Louise Finger
Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources Louise.Finger@dgif.virginia.gov - Cassandra Davis
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation cassandra.davis@dec.ny.gov - Scott Heidel
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection scheidel@pa.gov - Claire Buchanan
Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin cbuchan@icprb.org - Kelly Maloney
U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) kmaloney@usgs.gov